Politics

Finance Committee: Isaac Adongo Says Bills Face Bipartisan Scrutiny

Chairman Isaac Adongo clarifies that Parliament’s Finance Committee operates independently, with members from both sides shaping outcomes rather than his personal directives.

Isaac Adongo speaking on Joy News’ PM Express Business Edition
Finance Committee: Isaac Adongo Says Bills Face Bipartisan Scrutiny

Isaac Adongo, Chairman of Parliament’s Finance Committee, told Joy News’ PM Express Business Edition that government bills are examined through bipartisan scrutiny, with committee members steering decisions instead of his personal instructions.

Adongo said the chairman’s role is to facilitate the committee’s work but not to dictate its conclusions, adding, "You don't dictate to the committee what you want." His remarks came amid questions about whether he could challenge proposals from his own government, including those introduced by his friend, Dr Ato Forson.

He noted that the committee’s experience has not raised concerns, observing that almost every bill presented has been reviewed on a bipartisan basis. Adongo highlighted opposition members on the panel, such as former Finance Minister Dr Amin Adam, deputy ranking member Dr Stephen Amoah and Dr Gideon Boako, as evidence of the expertise involved.

Adongo stressed that the committee’s work must account for the national interest, saying, "Largely we agree on most of the things." When disagreements arise, members on both sides are given a chance to express their views. He cited the bill establishing the Gold Board as an example, noting that opposition members did not oppose its principle but had concerns about certain provisions.

Defending the decision to proceed, Adongo highlighted the "monumental impact of the gold board" while acknowledging that shortcomings could emerge and that the law could be revisited. He added, "Of course, over time, there will be some lapses that can be identified, and a review is possible at any point in time." He expressed confidence that opposition members would back a future review if the executive returned to Parliament with proposals to amend clauses.

Written by

Daniel

Blogs are whatever we make them.

Get weekly updates on all the top stories

Thanks! You’re on the list.

Support Us